'Sit down, kids. This is how we watched cricket back in my day'

If the producers weren’t missing Graham Gooch’s 300th run against India to show the runners and riders at Ascot, they were cutting to the lunchtime news instead of concentrating on Richard Illingworth’s wicket with his first ball in Tests. Or missing entire afternoon sessions to show some tedious no-hoper in the second round at Wimbledon.And that’s just the backwashed complaints – what about the countless thousands who never wanted to be bored witless by seven hours of cricket coverage in the first place? And yes, initially, I was among their number. My first true reaction to cricket was outrage that my lunchtime cartoons had been kiboshed by a cabal of tediously immobile morris dancers. And I guarantee you there are countless thousands still in bed this morning, whose first impressions have not budged an inch.But, and I reiterate, the lack of free will was paramount. It’s not for nothing that Stockholm Syndrome is a widely recognised psychological condition.My personal journey into cricket was a case of boredom giving way to curiosity, and spellbound devotion thereafter. Would I have given the game a second thought if I’d been able to flick over to YouTube and stick on the Norris Nuts instead? Such are the reasons why the free-to-air debate in the digital age has been more nuanced than the relist-the-crown-jewels brigade would have you believe.And yes, the debate is surely skewed by the era’s glorious finale. It’s only right and proper to acknowledge that, for six glorious years, right at the end of the terrestrial era, Channel 4 reshaped the game with the manner in which they documented English cricket’s golden years.They witnessed the blossoming of the first great England team of living memory – from rock-bottom humiliation in C4’s maiden year of coverage, through to that summer of summers in 2005. And they did so with aplomb that advanced the sport’s social reach to an extent unseen since Kerry Packer’s revolution at World Series Cricket two decades earlier.Their final day of coverage at The Oval turned into the most glorious leaving party the sport could ever have devised, as it was beamed up into the digital age on that bittersweet September afternoon, with a peak audience of 7.4 million aficionados, new and old, wondering if things could ever be the same again.Sky Sports, so easily disparaged whenever there’s a free-to-air fairytale to report, may have since perfected such concepts to transform the narrative once again. But no one can deny who the first movers were in this instance.But the original Channel 4 era is also something of a red herring. Without putting too fine a point on it, they were obliged to make an effort because the world was already changing, and crucially, nor were they the BBC, the channel that still goes on by default whenever your average viewer is at a loose end.Television’s traditional captive audience had long since loosened its bonds. And yet, as C4 seem to have realised making this audacious bid, there’s a potential twist to that narrative over the coming few weeks in India – because there’s a very unconventional new captive audience waiting to be cultivated.It’ll still be a struggle to pick up the true floating voters in this multi-platform era. But the true glory of this return to terrestrial coverage may well come around now, at 7 o’clock in the morning on a daily basis, when the kids fall out of bed during a national lockdown, to find their telly has already been hijacked for the day, and no, sod off, you’re not getting the remote control.Sit down, watch, listen, learn. This is how life was, back in my day. And yes, Dom Sibley is thoroughly tedious, isn’t he?Indoctrinate the incarcerated! It’s for the greater good.